#Technocracy #DeepState #MiddleState #ShallowState #Trump #AdministrativeBureaucracy #PoliticalControl #ConstitutionalDisregard
The Epoch Times, through an analysis by Jeffrey Tucker, delves into the complexities of the U.S. state, characterized by a three-layered structure of power and control over both the American populace and global affairs. This intricate system, consisting of the deep, middle, and shallow states, illustrates the typology of how a technocratic regime operates and maintains its influence. The concept, widely popularized by Donald Trump and supported by a serious body of literature, exposes the covert operations and the extensive grip of intelligence and security agencies like the CIA and FBI, amongst others. These entities represent the deep state, operating beyond public scrutiny and documented evidence, often dismissing detractors as conspiracy theorists due to the classified nature of their activities.
The middle state encompasses the vast administrative bureaucracy established since the Pendleton Act of 1883, which has swelled to more than 2 million employees across over 400 agencies. This layer illustrates the illusion of political control by elected officials, when in reality, it is the bureaucratic machinery that holds true power, preserving the status quo and influencing policy directions regardless of the political leadership in place. Trump’s efforts to assert control over this unwieldy bureaucracy through executive orders faced legal challenges and were ultimately thwarted, underscoring the deep entrenchment of the administrative state and its resistance to changes in governance.
The shallow state, composed of mainstream media outlets, social media platforms, and key financial sectors, completes the technocratic state’s trinity by serving as the facade of public engagement and consensus-building. This layer exploits its consumer-facing position to propagate narratives and policies favored by the deeper layers of the state, effectively blurring the lines between private action and government mandate. It demonstrates a symbiotic relationship where media and financial institutions play pivotal roles in disseminating and enforcing the technocratic agenda, reinforcing the power structure’s resilience against public dissent or political upheaval.
This analysis chronicles a modern technocratic regime’s workings in the United States, revealing a complex interplay between entrenched power structures that operate beyond the conventional understanding of democratic governance. It highlights the challenges of reforming or challenging this system, emphasizing the departure from constitutional principles and the growing divide between governance and the governed. As discussions about the implications of such a system and its resistance to change continue, the narrative of a battle for control and influence between the populous and a technocratic cartel unfolds, raising critical questions about the future of democratic governance and individual freedom.
Comments are closed.