Last updated on August 8, 2023
Lawyers representing Sam Bankman-Fried are arguing that his actions of allegedly sharing Caroline Ellison’s diary with the New York Times cannot be considered as witness tampering. Bankman-Fried, a prominent figure in the cryptocurrency industry, is facing legal accusations related to the alleged sharing of confidential information.
According to his legal team, the act of sharing Ellison’s diary with the media cannot be categorized as witness tampering because at the time of the alleged action, Ellison had not yet been identified as a potential witness. They argue that witness tampering involves intentionally influencing the testimony or actions of a known or potential witness, and since Ellison’s involvement was unknown at the time, the claim of tampering is invalid.
The defense further argues that the sharing of the diary was meant to bring to light certain issues related to Bankman-Fried’s case, rather than to influence or impact the testimony of any specific witness. They assert that the information contained in the diary was relevant to the public interest, and by sharing it with the media, Bankman-Fried aimed to raise awareness and shed light on the circumstances surrounding his legal situation.
It remains to be seen how the court will perceive these arguments and whether they will hold up against the accusations. As the case unfolds, the debate surrounding the alleged witness tampering and the disclosure of confidential information will play a crucial role in determining the outcome.
Image: https://weeklyfinancenews.online/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/business-news-picture.jpg
Comments are closed.