#UkraineWar #NATO #Russia #USPolitics #WorldWarIII #Globalists #AtlanticCouncil #MilitaryStrategy
**Globalists Escalate Ukraine War Amid US Election Tensions**
With the approaching U.S. elections, there is growing concern that globalist factions are maneuvering to push the Ukraine War towards a full-scale World War III. This assertion is credited to Brandon Smith, who argues in Alt-Market.us that NATO’s involvement in Ukraine has been consistently aimed at provoking a confrontation with Russia. According to Smith, Ukraine’s geopolitical interests have little to do with the well-being or economic advantage of Western nations. Instead, the conflict is presented as a pretext for a broader destabilizing agenda directed by global elites. Since 2014, NATO has been laying the groundwork for this confrontation, seemingly ignoring the possibility of diplomatic solutions in favor of escalation. The recent military actions in the Kursk region, which holds minimal strategic value, symbolize this ongoing effort to push the envelope and provoke a broader conflict.
Smith’s critique extends to both sides of the conflict, expressing skepticism about Russia’s relations with globalists. He postulates that the war between NATO-backed Ukraine and Russia serves the broader agenda of fostering global conflict, exacerbating economic downturns, and solidifying elite control. The portrayal by mainstream Western media, heavily influenced by think-tanks like the Atlantic Council, often paints Russia as the sole aggressor, downplaying NATO’s provocative maneuvers. Smith suggests that this narrative is a strategic ploy, designed to justify Western military escalation under the guise of defense. He further speculates that the actions in Kursk might be intended to bait Russia into large-scale retaliatory attacks on civilians, thereby manufacturing a pretext for broader NATO intervention or even UN involvement.
Smith’s analysis emphasizes that the ongoing war efforts and military aid to Ukraine are losing public support in the West. However, the strategy to keep the conflict alive includes exaggerated claims of Russian threats and advocating for advanced missile systems to be used against Russia. The Atlantic Council, Smith notes, has been a significant player in advising Ukraine and shaping Western policy. The think-tank’s influence stretches into U.S. governmental decisions, with proponents like Senator Lindsay Graham consistently pushing for aggressive strategies. The council’s insistence on the credibility of crossing “red lines” with Russia and minimizing the repercussions of a direct NATO engagement only heightens the risk of an uncontrollable escalation.
In summary, Smith’s viewpoint suggests that the globalist agenda is aimed at ensuring the conflict escalates to a level where diplomatic resolutions will no longer be feasible, especially ahead of the U.S. elections. The implication is that this escalation serves to entrench political control and economic reorganization under the guise of global stability. The appointment of Donald Trump, who has expressed intentions to swiftly end the Ukraine war through diplomatic means, adds another layer of urgency for those pushing for a broader conflict. By expanding the war beforehand, globalist elites could cement a situation that cannot be easily reversed, thereby complicating Trump’s proposed peace strategies and furthering their own geopolitical and economic interests.
Comments are closed.